Quantum Computing (Part 4 of 4)
Is the mysterious world of superposition a gateway to the demonic realm?
DISCLAIMER: The following is my opinion, based on my research and the research of others. I am not an authority on such matters. But I am concerned. Take what you see with a grain of salt and seek guidance from others more qualified that myself.
Notes from Scott
Let me begin by quoting Matthew 24:4 “And Jesus answered and said to them, "See to it that no one misleads you.” I bring this up because this is Part 4 of 4 of my series on quantum computing. My position of the interplay between AI + Quantum is something that I do talk about on interviews from time to time. I strongly suspect that AI will be the “controller” of tasks that will be delegated to quantum computers, such as the one at Google. There are two specific strong points that quantum qubits are exceedingly good at (see original post here):
Shor’s algorithm is perhaps the most famous quantum algorithm because it tackles the tough problem of factoring large numbers. Modern encryption relies on factoring large numbers (prime number theory) which is extremely slow for classical computers. Shor’s algorithm will eventually break this encryption, leading scientists to rethink security practices entirely. And this is the part where all privacy is broken, and all encryption is potentially hacked almost instantaneously.
Grover’s algorithm solves another common but difficult problem: searching large, unstructured databases. It does this by checking multiple entries simultaneously, exploiting quantum mechanics to quickly eliminate incorrect possibilities. This quantum “shortcut” dramatically speeds up the search, opening doors for quicker data analysis, searches in enormous datasets, and potential advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning.
IMPORTANT CONTEXT
Now, when reports came out that Google’s Sycamore quantum chip had something very disturbing happen when they were performing testing on research, it was concerning. This post is going to debunk the recent claims about what happened as reported in this (and other) YouTube videos (here). There are several more videos that are pushing the same basic narrative which are more inflammatory (click bait) but this one seemed more credible. Note the word: seemed.
Introduction to Google's Sycamore Quantum Chip
Google's Sycamore quantum chip is a groundbreaking piece of technology that has been at the forefront of quantum computing advancements. It is designed to perform calculations that are beyond the capabilities of even the fastest classical supercomputers. The chip has been involved in several significant experiments, including demonstrations of quantum supremacy.
What Makes the Sycamore Chip So Powerful?
Design and Architecture
The Sycamore processor is built with a grid of superconducting qubits, which are the quantum equivalent of bits in classical computing. Initially, it was designed with up to 54 qubits arranged in a square lattice, allowing for efficient connectivity and control over quantum operations (here). More recent versions have expanded to 67 and even 70 qubits, further enhancing its computational capabilities (here).
Quantum Operations
The chip supports a wide range of quantum operations, including single-qubit gates and two-qubit gates like iSWAP and Sycamore gates. These gates are crucial for executing complex quantum algorithms, such as those used in quantum simulation, optimization, and machine learning (here). The ability to perform simultaneous readout of all qubits is another key feature, allowing for efficient data collection during experiments.
Quantum Supremacy
One of the most significant achievements of the Sycamore chip was demonstrating quantum supremacy. This means it can perform certain computational tasks much faster than any classical computer.
For example, in one experiment, the Sycamore processor took about 200 seconds to sample a quantum circuit a million times, a task that would take a classical supercomputer approximately 10,000 years.
The Speculative Claims made about Sycamore
Recent Experiments
Recent experiments with the Sycamore chip have focused on pushing its capabilities further. Researchers have been exploring how to reduce noise in quantum computations, which is a major challenge in quantum computing. During some tests, an unexpected anomaly was observed. The AI system Grok 3 detected a repeating, coherent structure in the chip's output that defied explanation. This pattern was not expected in the inherently chaotic realm of quantum mechanics. Researchers ruled out hardware malfunctions and environmental interference, leaving open the possibilities of hidden quantum order, unknown physical forces, or even self-organization within the system.
Reaction to the “Anomaly”
Following the anomaly, there have been reports of the Sycamore chip being shut down. Google has been tight-lipped about the details, citing the need to protect ongoing research and prevent unnecessary panic. However, the company has announced plans to conduct a thorough review of its quantum research program, focusing on safety and transparency.
Overview of the Transcript
Here’s the link to the video I’ve been analyzing.
Here is a breakdown of the video. We will talk more about this in the next section. But what I want you to pay attention to is a NARRATIVE that is highly suspicious. It supports efforts by the enemy to subvert the Lord’s universe, to support alien intelligence, to support an evolutionary mindset that justifies that (Yuval Harari) “we are useless meat eaters” and “we are already greater than God” and more such nonsense that tends to tickle the ears of the elites. Be careful of this man (here).
Pay attention to my in-line notes!
Experiment Setup
Google’s Sycamore quantum processor (53 qubits) was used in a simulation meant to study how quantum fluctuations might have seeded cosmic inflation right after the Big Bang. [True]
The team ran “recursive loops of entangled qubits” looking for patterns that might inform cosmological models. [True]
Discovery of the “Omega Pattern”
Instead of random fluctuations, researchers observed a recurring, stable structure called the omega pattern. [No, this is refuted in the analysis below.]
This pattern somehow reassembled itself after the processor’s memory registers were cleared—behaving as though it “remembered” or “self-corrected. [NOTE: This got my attention.]
Persistence and Evolution
Each reset of the qubits didn’t erase the pattern. It re-emerged, sometimes more complex or “richer” than before. [NOTE: This is impossible! When you turn off a computer chip—even a quantum chip—the memory also clears. This is playing off interdimensional entanglement that has more to do with pushing a multiverse (read: we are not alone) narrative than a scientific narrative. These things are not provable, reducing such theories that defy the Lord’s creation, and the Biblical Worldview as lies from the enemy to sow fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Classic John 10:10 "The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I came that they may have life, and have [it] abundantly.” So, if Satan can thwart the second part of this verse, then more people are deceived and apostatized, etc.]
Some describe this as “memory in the fabric of space” or a code that writes itself. [NOTE: See it yet? Memory!?! Memory isn’t possible unless there is a brain function, correct? So, what are they implying here? Hmm, alien intelligence perhaps? Time will tell. My hunch is we’ll see more “news” like this.]
Possible Interpretations
Holographic Principle: The pattern could be a glimpse of the universe’s underlying quantum “blueprint” if spacetime emerges from quantum bits. [No, nothing supports this statement.]
Quantum Fractal or Universal Attractor: The pattern could be akin to fractals in nature (like the Mandelbrot set), scaling across multiple domains of physics. [No, but again here is the hint about multiple domains/dimensions.]
Error-Correction Signature: A built-in mechanism that ensures the consistency of reality, like parity bits in classical computing. [No, built-in…really? How stupid is the general public exactly? LOL]
Quantum Retrocausality: Information might flow backward in time, allowing the pattern to draw on future states to maintain itself. [No, you cannot go backwards…therefore this is a lie.]
Heightened Speculation
Some fear it’s a “countdown” or has some built-in “deadline” that might trigger a phase transition in spacetime. [No, this is more Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. Mostly FEAR! Look out for someone to put it out there that this countdown is expected in 2030. Or perhaps the Age of Aquarius. Are you listening, Watchmen?]
Others suggest the “omega pattern” is a universal invariant that’s been found in historical datasets (e.g., old Higgs boson runs at CERN) and in gravitational wave signals from LIGO. [Okay, so here’s one mystery pointing to another mystery. Bringing up CERN is predictable.]
Link to Extra Dimensions
In later runs, the pattern morphs into a shape matching a low-dimensional projection of certain string-theory geometries (Calabi–Yau manifolds). [No, scientific nonsense. A low-dimension projection?? Huh?]
The transcript claims these correlations appear in data from black hole mergers as well—implying the same “fingerprint” emerges on multiple scales (quantum, gravitational, cosmic). [No, so here you go again, more multiverse narrative, because we’ve been told for years that “black holes” are connected by “worm holes” that lead to “other universes” and if you recall, PROVE that one string touching another string (i.e. string theory, here) transfers massive energy…suggesting that it was another portion of the multiverse that created the Big Bang when two strings collided randomly.]
Philosophical and Existential Implications
The pattern could indicate the universe is designed or is effectively a self-checking code. [No, the LORD created the universe, and He exists in three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Impersonalizing the universe into “code” is a direct afront to Genesis and a Biblical Worldview.]
Brian Cox refers to it as “the first line of the universe’s source code,” suggesting we may have found a fundamental aspect of reality that unifies quantum mechanics, gravity, and information theory. [No, but they want celebrity scientists to use their influence to push a man-made religious faith system that subverts the God of the Bible.]
Google’s Real Report vs. The Transcript’s Claims
What the video transcript says:
It describes a stable, self-reassembling pattern appearing in Sycamore’s qubits, hinting at a hidden code in space-time.
Reality check: What Google actually reported
Google’s team is known for their 2019 demonstration of “quantum supremacy” with Sycamore. They ran a random circuit sampling test that a classical supercomputer would take a very long time to match.
No official statement mentions a self-replicating quantum pattern that “learns” or “remembers” after resets.
If such a ground-breaking event happened, it would be huge news. It would appear in top journals (like Nature or Science). But there’s silence. That’s a strong sign the transcript’s claims are not accurate.
Scientific Replication (or the Lack Thereof)
What the video transcript says:
Suggests that “multiple labs worldwide” tried to reproduce the omega pattern. It implies widespread attention.
Reality check:
No major quantum computing labs (IBM, IonQ, Rigetti, academic groups) have published any replication of this phenomenon.
In real science, a finding this big would spur many teams to confirm or refute it. The absence of published results is telling.
Breakthroughs like these must be repeatable. If no one can replicate them, it casts serious doubt on the claim.
Quantum Mechanics vs. “Reality-Defying” Phenomena
What the video transcript says:
It claims that the omega pattern breaks “every rule in the quantum playbook,” suggesting new physics that topples standard theories.
What established physics says:
Quantum mechanics often seems counterintuitive, but it follows well-tested rules. Experiments that supposedly break those rules always undergo intense scrutiny.
No respected research discredits well-known quantum laws like entanglement or superposition in a way that this transcript suggests.
“Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor” (Google AI Quantum and collaborators, Nature, 2019). This is the real paper on Sycamore’s abilities and does not mention any pattern that defies quantum laws.
Resetting Qubits Doesn’t Leave “Hidden Memory”
What the video transcript says:
The pattern “didn’t vanish” after Sycamore was reset, as if the qubits “remembered” or “self-corrected.”
What hardware experts know:
When qubits reset, they’re forced into a standard starting state (often |0⟩). Minor noise can appear, but a reappearance of a complex fractal pattern would be extraordinary.
Any leftover data would usually signal an error in the reset process, not some cosmic code.
Quantum systems are notoriously fragile. Keeping data stable requires specialized error-correction protocols. A spontaneously reassembling pattern is inconsistent with how real devices behave.
No Peer-Reviewed Research on the “Omega Pattern”
What the video transcript says:
Mentions alleged findings in older CERN data and gravitational wave readings. It even ties them to exotic theories of extra dimensions.
What we actually see in papers:
Mainstream physics journals do not mention a persistent “omega pattern” in collider data or LIGO signals.
Bold claims connecting extra dimensions to a single quantum experiment remain purely speculative, with no official support.
In science, extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. No peer-reviewed evidence has emerged to confirm these grand statements.
Putting It All Together
The video transcript makes a flashy story: quantum computers uncovering cosmic secrets, rewriting physics, even hinting at cosmic design. However, based on everything Google and other labs have published, there’s no sign this story is true. Quantum computing is a cutting-edge field, but it still follows a careful process of peer review and reproducible experiments. Claims of “reality-shattering patterns” need confirmation across multiple labs and robust data. So far, we see none of that.
What do we learn from this post?
Okay, so it’s interesting how I made several mentions of this story over the past few months. I give myself some credit by saying that I’m still doing research on the claims and speculation asserted in this and other news sources. I’m glad I hedged. Because as we look at what is happening from a Watchman’s point of view and as a good Berean, we can hear the hissing of the enemy, the deception narrative that seeks to remove God from absolutely everything: creation (Genesis) through to our eternal state (Revelation).
I’m left with an important lesson, and its bears repeating to my audience. We must be on the lookout for deception.
just covered this (here with a different angle). Let’s boil this down into some principles…how does that sound?Watch out for deception. Research everything you see before making bold statements that support what might be a false narrative. [NOTE: I’m talking to myself here, too.]
Priming is rampant. Pay attention to efforts that set groundwork for a “multiverse” or “aliens” or “interdimensional intelligence”.
Listen for the “hiss”. The enemy uses the same old framework over and over again. Be discerning of his evil tactics. Anything that smacks of “…did God really say…” is a RED FLAG!
Own the days we are in. As I repeatedly say, you are deep operatives in local churches. Guard your heart and mind. Your armor has to be on ALL THE TIME at this point. Be extremely careful about speculative things, because if you go down these rabbit trails to your pastors or board or others in your circle of influence, you’re going to take a reputation hit at just the wrong time. [Again, I’m talking to myself here!]
This concludes the Quantum Computer Series and it’s been very interesting. I have learned a lot. I trust it has been informative to you, too. I especially appreciate those of you in the comments that share that my writing style helps brings the cookie jar down from the shelf and to the countertop (thank you Tom Hughes!) At least I’m trying!
I need another complex multi-part series like I need a whole in the head, LOL. But let me just take one for the team and cover CERN next. Does that sound okay? Comment below! I kinda apologize for this post being so long ;)
#Maranatha
YBIC,
Scott
As I was watching the video, what kept going through my mind was that they are seeing hints of the hand of God who produced the entire quantum structure as He created our disposable universe. They are seeing things allowed by the hand of God. Satan is doing all he can to keep them confused. But a thousand years from now the entire entangled mess will come apart and who knows what Elohim has planned for the new creation? It will be spectacular. We need to remember that quantum mechanics came from the mind of God. All of creation did.
Lord, we pray that you show us the lies as they appear. We thank you that you have it all covered. You are using all of this for evidence at the Great White Throne. We worship you, Lord. Amen.
Thank you, Scott, for putting these articles together in such a way that I am able to comprehend.
Your format and writing skills with the deeply technical material is superb.
Certainly, Satan and his minions are and will be doing their very best to deceive any of us, and especially those souls who have not yet accepted Christ.
I had purchased a few of your "rapture kit" a couple years ago to have on my desk, ready for someone to investigate because I have "disappeared". This also was a great idea you developed and distributed.
Blessings - waiting for His trumpet,
Ken